> On 13 Jul 2021, at 10:46 pm, Hank Nussbacher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 13/07/2021 14:08, Job Snijders via routing-wg wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:25:11AM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>> It might also be that the operational community has chosen other fora to
>>> discuss because this working group is not working.
>> What a strange thing to say. Of course there are other fora to discuss
>> RPKI, one of the most important ones is IETF's SIDROPS working group
>> (which is quite active!).
>> As for the road map - RIPE NCC indicated feedback can be shared with the
>> routing-wg@ or with [email protected]. I myself opted to try the latter
>> route to re-iterate a request for publish dashboards and graphs about
>> the RPKI service which resulted in 'RPKI-2021-#01' being added to the
>> roadmap.
>> The motivation behind RPKI-2021-#01 is that many IXPs offer publicly
>> accessible graphs ala:
>> https://www.ams-ix.net/ams/documentation/total-stats
>> https://portal.linx.net/
>> https://www.jpnap.net/ix/traffic.html
>> https://www.netnod.se/ix/statistics
>> https://de-cix.net/en/locations/frankfurt/statistics
>> When incidents happen, these graphs enable the IX participants to
>> quickly understand whether 'something is wrong', because humans are
>> really good at pattern recognition.
>> I imagine that developing more insight into the RIPE NCC RPKI service
>> will offer the community similar benefits as what the community gleans
>> from these public IX stats, hence the ask for RPKI-2021-#01.
>> Kind regards,
>> Job
>
> Tool missing that I would like to see:
>
> Breakdown by country - unknowns + invalid ROAs. Listed as a table of prefix
> + ASN. Best I have found is https://stats.labs.apnic.net/roas which lists
> totals but doesn't provide a breakdown by specific prefix and ASN per
> country. Maybe I'm missing it.
>
https://stats.labs.apnic.net/roas/IL
more generally, https://stats.labs.apnic.net/roas/cc for any country code and
https://stats.labs.apnic.net/roas/ASnn for any AS
(Maxmind is pretty crappy and there are lots of small scale anomalies in
per-country attribution in this report which annoy me A LOT!)
regards,
Geoff
