Dear colleagues,

Last week, on Wednesday 4 May 2022, 14:00 UTC, we held a RIPE NCC Open House on 
the topic of RPKI Data.
You can find the recording here: 
https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/open-house/ripe-ncc-open-house-rpki-data
 
<https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/open-house/ripe-ncc-open-house-rpki-data>

Thank you to all who participated, I thought it was a useful session and I 
enjoyed the discussion and feedback we received.
During the session I promised to send an e-mail to this list with a summary of 
all data and visualisations we currently have public for RPKI:

Visualisations:

https://certification-stats.ripe.net/ <https://certification-stats.ripe.net/>
-Generated from the RIR Trust Anchor Statistics https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/ 
<https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/>

https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html
 
<https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html>
-Generated from "delegated stats” in combination with BGP data from RIS
-No IPv6 

Data:

https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/ <https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/>
-Documented on 
https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/internet-dataset-descriptions/blob/main/rpki-repo-archive.md
 
<https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/internet-dataset-descriptions/blob/main/rpki-repo-archive.md>
-Daily data per Trust Anchor per 2011

Public tools:

https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/ui/ <https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/ui/>
-User interface for Relying Party software

https://stat.ripe.net/widget/rpki-by-trust-anchor 
<https://stat.ripe.net/widget/rpki-by-trust-anchor>
-Generated from https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/ <https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/>

https://stat.ripe.net/app/use-cases/asn/rpki-check/S1_3333_C16e 
<https://stat.ripe.net/app/use-cases/asn/rpki-check/S1_3333_C16e> (example)
-Shows the RPKI validity state for a combination of prefix and Autonomous 
System.
-Generated from https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/ui/ 
<https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/ui/>

https://stat.ripe.net/docs/02.data-api/rpki-history.html 
<https://stat.ripe.net/docs/02.data-api/rpki-history.html>
-API call returns a timeseries with the count of VRPs (Validated ROA Payload) 
for the requested resource.  
-Generated from https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/ <https://ftp.ripe.net/rpki/>


My key take aways from the session:

-Ruediger Volk asked for an inventory of our current data, visualisations and 
tools. I started by this e-mail to the Working Group and I’m still considering 
how to make them easier to find on our website. 
-Randy Bush noted that experiments will/might pollute our data. Ties suggested 
to add known experiments to the GitHub dataset description.
-Mingwei Zhang mentioned that he is currently working with Emile Aben and 
Agustin Formoso on “when did a VRP appear/disappear” feature for RIPEstat. This 
will be a very valuable addition for trouble shooting. 
-John Kristoff would like to see statistics on the time it takes from the 
moment someone hits “submit” in the LIR portal for a ROA, to the moment the VRP 
is visible in the repository and when it is seen picked up by routers. 
-Job Snijders mentioned that it would be beneficial to have ftp.ripe.net/rpki 
<http://ftp.ripe.net/rpki> data available as rsync://ftp.ripe.net/rpki 
<rsync://ftp.ripe.net/rpki>
-Amreesh Phokeer suggested a more granular data set for Trust Anchor data. This 
is currently a daily dump. We are interested to hear how granular would be 
useful. Also Amreesh would be interested in statistics about revoked ROAs. 
-Ruediger Volk added that he would be interested in data that shows how 
frequent CRLs are used. Job Snijders provided insight in his mail to the WG: 
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/2022-May/004566.html 
<https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/2022-May/004566.html>
-Sacha mentioned that it would be useful to have a tool that would show how a 
ROA would impact a route, without actually creating that ROA, or for a prefix 
that you don’t have holdership of.  
-Nathalie said that she would like to get rid of the world map, as it is now 
well-known and does not include IPv6. A better alternative, that includes IPv6 
can be found on: https://rpki-maps.nlnetlabs.nl/ui/world.html 
<https://rpki-maps.nlnetlabs.nl/ui/world.html>

We’re looking into all your suggestions and where possible implement them. Stay 
tuned :)

If I missed something, or if you want to share your thoughts, have suggestions, 
please send an e-mail to the list or directly to us on [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>

Kind regards,

Nathalie Trenaman
Routing Security Programme Manager
RIPE NCC





-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/routing-wg

Reply via email to