Speaking of semantics, we should figure out a standard term for the DNS model that Kepa has suggested.
Anyway, in that model, if a "small provider" (also needs a definition!) is able to send a claim (or anything) directly to a payor using the health plan's "smart EDI address"... will this automatically mean that the payor will be able to discover the address/route back to the provider for 271s, 824s, etc.? (I assume that the 835 will require special handling in a provider-payor agreement) Does the provider's EDI address automatically get entered into the "DNS table" in this proposed model? -Chris Christopher J. Feahr, OD http://visiondatastandard.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268
