Rachel,
Yes. The prime example would be Medicare - each of our entities has a
Medicare provider number, and yes, we must use that number when billing
Medicare.  Ditto MediCal.  I inquired with a couple of our larger business
offices, and their response was yes for many of the health plans, but not as
frequently for the fee-for-service payers (to the extent that any still
remain...).  If we had 5 or 6 plans for a given payer, then, yes, we could
have as many IDs for that payer, although normally we don't. For many
payers, we have a single identifier for each business entity, regardless of
the number of plans.
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:38 AM
To: WEDi SNIP 4 (E-mail 3)
Subject: Number of IDs assigned to a provider


I'm forwarding the message below to this list since it contains what I
believe is extremely relevant information regarding identifiers, the number
of identifiers a given provider may have with a given payer, and thus the
implications for requirements/solutions for identifiers.

I've deleted the non-relevant portions of the message.

My question to this group: is the assignment of several identifiers to a
given provider common business practice?

Rachel
Rachel Foerster
Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd.
Phone: 847-872-8070


-----Original Message-----
From: Hooser, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Web authentication for HIPAA


Thanks for the thoughtful response.  Pretty much the same principles I have.


Further comment:

We have possibly 25,000-40,000 providers needing access with an average of
4-6 ids each;  that's 200,000+ users right off the bat.  Requiring tokens,
readers, cards, etc. in that fluid (staff coming and going, moving, etc.)
environment would be costly, cumbersome, overhead intensive (as any "client"
solution is), and very challenging - in my view;  and I don't believe the
software-only certificates add much or any value beyond strong, enforced
passwords.

Reply via email to