|
As it works out the NM1s at the 1000 loop are the
same as what I am placing in the GS but they are wanting the break at the GS-GE
level rather than at the ST-SE level. Whether I put the logic to restart
at the GS-GE or ST-GE didn't make that much difference. It is just the
fact that another payer that process multiple states and line of businesses may
have different rules and then the logic has to be changed for the customers
using my software and then I am back to square one in which I have to have
multiple variations of the national EDI standard instead of one standard for all
payers.
Gale
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin
Scholl
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:16 PM
Subject: RE: Trading Partner ID Thanks for all the input.
That helped a lot with the ISA/GS issue. But
how about the loop 1000 , NM1_08 and NM1_09 with the 40/41
qualifier.
What are you guys doing there usually? Again use
the same IDs as in ISA 06 and 08?
Martin
|
- Trading Partner ID Martin Scholl
- RE: Trading Partner ID Bill Chessman
- Re: Trading Partner ID robert . poiesz
- RE: Trading Partner ID Rachel Foerster
- RE: Trading Partner ID robert . poiesz
- Re: Trading Partner ID Gale Carter
- RE: Trading Partner ID Rachel Foerster
- RE: Trading Partner ID Martin Scholl
- Re: Trading Partner ID William J. Kammerer
- Re: Trading Partner ID Gale Carter
- Re: Trading Partner ID Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
- Re: Trading Partner ID Martin Scholl
- Re: Trading Partner ID William J. Kammerer
- RE: Trading Partner ID Rachel Foerster
- RE: Trading Partner ID robert . poiesz
- RE: Trading Partner ID Bill Chessman
- Re: Trading Partner ID William J. Kammerer
- Re: Trading Partner ID Martin Scholl
- Re: Trading Partner ID Kepa Zubeldia
- RE: Trading Partner ID Bill Chessman
