Martin Stjernholm wrote:
>"Arjan van Staalduijnen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> /.../ The vary_callback mechanism was the only thing available to
>> guarantee proper responses to non-supportive browsers, so in my
>> opinion it is a requirement.
>Perhaps true if you do it in a module, but if you build it into the
>protocol then you can bypass the cache or (if it's worth the bother)
>unpack the compressed cache entry. That's what I meant.
Uncompressing the cache entry usually is faster than reading it from disk
(unless you're using 100% CPU because of other threads already).
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!"
