Henrik Grubbstr?m wrote: >On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>>Or did you guys finally convert to git somewhere? >It's still in CVS. A git conversion is planned, but has had to wait >for a suitable time in the release schedule (since any change will >affect the build system). Ok, thanks. I'll sync my CVS->git leeches for 5.1 and 5.2 then (unless you already do something like that internally and can point me to an unofficial git mirror of the CVS). -- Stephen. Sex is like air. It's only a big deal if you can't get any.
