>> There may be a use-case for @including Roxygen comments, but I think my
>> use-case would benefit more from pure Rd that would just be concatenated
>> into the resulting Rd file. These would be things like extra \section{}s.
>> Maybe make that more explicit with a @section that refers to a file?
>
> Maybe if the include file has an *.rdox suffix (or whatever), it could
> be normal roxygen formatted, and if it is *.Rd, it's just straight Rd
> text that's inlined into the appropriate place of the final
> roxygen-constructed Rd file.And if it was .R it could be treated as commented roxygen tags. I think that would work well for @templates. There's no way that Rd includes/templates can work in the short-term, because they need to be parsed and converted in to roxygen's Rd object format, but long-term I think it's reasonable. Where do you think the files should live? Templates currently live in man-roxygen (i.e. that's where the path defaults to), but maybe they should default to the root directory so you can specify where they live. Hadley -- Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair Department of Statistics / Rice University http://had.co.nz/ _______________________________________________ Roxygen-devel mailing list Roxygen-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/roxygen-devel
