Timothy Peierls wrote: >John Wilson wrote: > >>Personally I hate it but I think it would be unwise to >>break the spec. >> > >Agreed. You can bet there's some client out there that relies >on Content-length because the spec said it would be there (and >that it would be correct). > Yes. For a moment I had thought we could still have universal compatibility (well, close to universal ;-) without Content-Length header, but since this is obviously not the case I agree it's a bad idea to go that way.
Hannes
