Dan, On 2002.02.27 11:10:10 -0700 Daniel Rall wrote: > Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have no idea - I don't use the XmlRpcClient directly, only the Lite > > so I don't know the behavior of the XmlRpcClient in this case. > > public class XmlRpcClientLite > extends XmlRpcClient >
Surely, but the action is in the "Worker" and I have no idea whether the behavior of the XmlRpcClient.Worker is the same as XmlRpcClientLite.LiteWorker. The execute methods are completely different and may, or may not, exhibit the same problems. If they don't, perhaps my fix is entirly at the wrong level and the problem is correctable lower in the protocol. If they do, then probably the fix should be applied in the superclass. Jim -- Jim Redman (505) 662 5156 http://www.ergotech.com
