EXT-Raiteri, Ashley L wrote: > i Strongly concurr with that (single pass), but that means that martin has > to do it all at once very quickly, otherwise merge problems will occurr. > Perhaps a Weekend would be a good time to do it, closing the code on friday > morning, with a warning to everyone that might be working on patches, and > then submitting the changes across the board for a rev drop on a monday > morning. > ash
sounds like a plan ;-) martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [request] new commiter > > > Martin Poeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>why don't you want the code to be (re)formatted?? >>do you like the code as it is?? > > > Not particularly, but won't I don't like are tons of random code > reformatting changes in the CVS diffs, especially when they're mixed > with code changes (Jon! ;-). But if everyone else is in favor of it > I'd withdraw my objects if you can hold the changes to a single pass > over the code. > > >>which coding conventions should be used for xmlrpc?? > > > I like Turbine's. ;) > > > - Dan
