Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why do have the SAX classes in our CVS? I just spent two hours tracking > down a 'loader constraint violation' which was the result of having the > SAX classes in the xmlrpc JAR. The package compiles just fine without > them if you have xerces in your ANT_HOME/lib.
Oooh, that's a fun one. I've hit that too with Catalina. > If they need to be in the jar for embedded purposes can we please change > the build so that we have a jar without the SAX classes? say xmlrpc.jar > and xmlrpc-full.jar? I hate that -full crap -- let's do just one JAR. John, I assume removing the interfaces bytecode would cause run-time problems if they were not present separately? At the very least, we might want to update them to a more recent version. Dan
