Jim,

Sounds great! I think the status now is that we are keeping the XmlRpcClient class but pulling out the salient bits into more focused classes. The XmlRpcClient class will depend only on interfaces, and implementations for those interfaces will be distributed in separate packages to facilitate building JARs that are tailored to specific users. This is all still pre-alpha of course, and we weclome further discussion.

Your's looks like a great use case to help us with the design direction here. If you search the archives for the "HttpClient Integration" thread you can read a lot of the recent progress in this area, with the bulk of the tangible code coming from Andrew Evers.

--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net

Jim Redman wrote:

I only vaguely remember the discussion of adding an interface for the client. Can someone provide a quick synopsis and the status?

It just became relevent to me because I have a need for a CLDC client. kxmlrpc assumes MIDP (HttpConnection). Since MinML is (just about) CLDC compliant, if I can easily convert the XmlRpcClient to CLDC I may have a good solution. If I'm going to do this, I might as well make it compliant with the forthcoming interface.

Jim



Reply via email to