Ryan Hoegg wrote: Ryan Hoegg wrote:
Hi, I didn't reply to the whole list of lists to which this was posted, but I wanted to see if anyone in the XML-RPC project has a better angle on this than I do.How many members of the XML PMC do you believe are actively monitoring and participating in the development of this project? If you said zero, then this is a problem. There are multiple ways to address this. One is simply to make xml-rpc a top level project (parallel to jakarta, httpd, etc).
What does this all mean in English? This seems to be the tail end of a long thread from some other list. How is this going to affect the XML-RPC project?
For example, I would be alarmed to see XML-RPC, Axis, and XML-Security all get a mandate to become one project or leave Apache.How many committers to xml-rpc are also committers to Axis or xml-security? If the answer is zero, then this is not a solution either.
Don't be overly alarmed, nothing is going to change without approval of the committers of this project, but the overall message is that we need to move towards an organization structure where the active committers of this project are represented in the PMC which is charged with overseeing this codebase.
- Sam Ruby
