Does it implement a global registry for searching for kinds of services,
the way uddi works?  Does it allow you to publish your service to a
central directory the way uddi does?  I appreciate your answer and my
knowledge on soap/xml is increasing.  Just out of curiousity what would
be an example of where rpc/xml would not be able to do something
requiring soap/xml?

Thanks,

Tim Heath

John Wilson wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: xml-rpc webservices?
> 
> > I am talking about conforming to the wsdl, soap, xml, uddi
> > specifications that .net, velocigen, glue, etc... are using.  You can
> > find more about this at www.xmethods.net.  What confuses me is the
> > difference between xml-rpc and apache soap.  If you can elaborate on
> > this I would really appreciate it.  The other thing which I wanted to
> > know is if there is some kind of middle tier or library for converting
> > such attempts at implementing webservices specifications from one to the
> > other for interoperability.
> 
> Well, XML-RPC uses XML (obviously!). However it's not SOAP. The XML-RPC
> community seems to potter along without the need for global multi level
> directory services. The stuff mostly works and interoperates (between a very
> large number of implementations in a very large number of languages).
> 
> XML-RPC is a simple RPC mechanism which just aims to support remote
> procedure calls over HTTP with relatively simple data. SOAP is a far more
> complex (and rich) mechanism which supports both RPC and message passing
> models over arbitrary transport mechanisms with and open ended data model.
> XML-RPC is probably sufficient for 90% of the real world cases, SOAP is
> probably sufficient for 95%. SOAP is one or two orders of magnitude more
> complex. Both allow the implementation of Web Services. I don't know of any
> interoperability layer. I'm not sure it would be worthwhile building one.
> 
> Does this help?
> 
> John Wilson
> The Wilson Partnership
> http://www.wilson.co.uk

Reply via email to