"jan rinze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi David, > > Just out of curiosity, if you are not good at C or gcc then why do you > want to build it from scratch? Tom has good windows binaries on his > website so if necessary you can download them.
There are updates in subversion that are not in the built downloads. I was hoping that a later build might be more stable. The latest RPCemu 0.7 for Windows at http://b-em.bbcmicro.com/arculator/download.html has exe's dated 15/06/2007. Just to help me make my mind up RPCemu has just crashed on Vista, I had to reboot to get rid of it. That was OS4.04 on the recompiler. > I don't think that RPCemu is the best way to start to learn about C or GCC > for that matter.. To build packages like RPCemu one does not have to get involved in C at source level, all that is needed is to get all the tools and any dependencies, then run the makefile. This was quite straight forward with Linux. -- David Pitt _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
