> On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:22:08 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'm with Alan that we cannot let the Windows build fall behind and should be >> aiming for as unified an engine as possible. > > Yes off course I would like that too but we can't promise that every > change we make will work for all platforms because we don't have the > resources to test it. So if people still wants RPCEmu to get developed > for their platform I think it's not too much to ask them to join the > development or at least keep track of the changes and tell us if new > versions of the software still work on their platform. >
I completely understand your position and I'm pleased you've taken on RPCEmu. I just thought it was better to state my desire for a Windows version so you knew people were interested on running it for that platform. I was fairly sure you wouldn't deliberately be doing things to make it linux only, but I would have kicked myself if 6 months from now there was an announcement about RPCEmu becoming linux only and I'd kept quiet. With the announcement of RISC OS 4 for a fiver, it looks like I may be able to do some testing sooner than I thought. Thanks again for taking up this project. Regards, Alan P.S. Has anyone created a makefile to build RPCEmu on Cygwin. If so I'd love to have a look at and would see if I could get it working and added to the RPCEmu development. _________________________________________________________________ Imagine a life without walls. See the possibilities. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/122465943/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
