Hi Tom, > On 09/10/09 16:50, Tom Hughes wrote: > I've played with a 32 bit version now and it is indeed related to some > custom assembly code in allegro - it's a seriously vintage x86 > instruction that does something funky with a segment prefix.
Thanks for looking into it. > It looks like valgrind is claiming to translate the instruction (which > is quite surprising as it rejects a lot of stuff involving segment > registers) but is doing so wrongly leading to the kernel forcing a > segv probably due to an underlying hardware trap of some sort. OK, so maybe 32-bit valgrind, RPCEmu, and Allegro will be happier together in the future. Meanwhile, I guess I just stick to /usr/bin/time and small specific test scripts. Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
