On 7 Apr 2010, Jim Lesurf <[email protected]> wrote: > Out of curiosity I've just tried a comparison between my Iyonix and my > new Linux laptop running RPCEmu.
[snip details] > Overall I was quite impressed by that as I think it means that RPCEmu > was somewhat faster than an actual RiscPC doing the same task! :-) I've noticed similar results with RPCEmu v0.8.6 (Spoon), RO4.39, on an HP laptop, running Vista on an Intel Core2 Duo 1.60Ghz processor. The following times (from a timer built into the database) relate to a 29MB DataPower file: Hardware SARPC RPCEmu hp550 laptop Software DP2.26 DP2.26 DP2.19 Reader Task Compile indexes, secs 129 69 2 Update database, secs 260 118 5 RPCEmu is 87% - 120% faster than the SARPC. In both cases the DP file and !Scrap are in RAM, to avoid disc read/write access. As to be expected, the DPReader, which runs without emulation, is very much faster than either the SARPC or RPCEmu. Tony _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
