On 23 Oct 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> I recently ran Richard Spencer‘s benchmarking app romark 1.01 on both > my RPCEmu installations (0.8.8 Any reason for not using 0.8.9? > /5.17 and 0.8.9/4.02 respectively). Here > are the results (0.8.8/5.17 first, % advantage of 0.8.8/5.17 last): or 0.8.9/4.02 last? [snip results, etc] > ... I find the degree of difference generally, and in particular, > HD/FS Read/Writes and Icon plotting, surprising. Indeed. Tony _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
