On 5 Dec 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] > However, this does not explain how I am able to make 1824 x 1026 x 16M > run on RPCEmu089/5.17 and not on 089/4.02 using the same MDF - I'm > still mystified. Agreed. If my arithmetic is correct, that resolution, and colour depth, requires a VRAM of 7.14MB, so it _should_ fit into the 8MB emulated VRAM available on both 5.17 and 4.02. I can't suggest why it doesn't. Tony _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
