Hi Greg and welcome,

Thanks for your comment/input.

On Mar 15, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Gregory Massel wrote:

Regarding the policy ("IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites"), I would strongly urge that section 3 be amended in accordance with Andrew's suggestions of /48's assigned on /44 boundaries out of a reserved block of at least /28. Otherwise it is an excellent proposal.
Ditto Colins' response.

I think we should leave this to the RIR (AfriNIC) to determine when making the assignment. What do you think?

-v


-Greg

_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd


_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd

Reply via email to