On 10/09/2007 17:00 Ernest - (AfriNIC) wrote:
We have been actively in touch with those organisations whose allocations
are not yet announced (after 12 months) numerous times, reminding them
about being in breach of the policy.
In most cases, we have received acceptable explanation from them about
the cause of the deployment delay, with commitment to deploy/announce the
allocation at some time in the near future (usually, 1 - 3 months).
Is there some wording I've missed? Is this clause enforceable?
Yes, the clause is enforceable. Please see clauses 6, 7 and 13 of the
Registration Services Agreement (RSA) below:
http://www.afrinic.net/corporate/aflgl-rsa200407.pdf
Can "plan" be defined for me?
Not straight forward to define - but will give an example: If ISP A is
going to assign a /48 to each of his/her current 50 leased-line
customers, this sounds like an acceptable plan to us.
We will ordinarily ask for proper justification (in form of documented
proof or otherwise), and allocate if the plan is satisfactorily justified.
Thanks for this, that all sounds perfectly reasonable :)
--
Colin Alston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
