On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 14:55 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:45 PM Jonathan Dieter <jdie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 14:17 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > DNF is now using libdnf, so you shouldn't need to repeat it twice. > > > > > > But that said, the path you describe makes sense. > > > > So should I go with the first flow which abstracts zchunk away from > > librepo clients or the second flow which is a bit less convoluted, but > > requires librepo clients to understand zchunk? > > > > The second flow.
Ok, thanks for the feedback. That's what I'll do. Jonathan _______________________________________________ Rpm-ecosystem mailing list Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem
