On Thursday, September 15, 2016 3:28:45 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Sure, multiple is more correct. I'm not hung about the exact message, just 
> wanted to point out you can easily get by with one-liner change for this.

ACK.  That previous patch looks lame at the first sight, at least I could avoid
the useless brackets.

Fixed as you suggested, please take another look.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Rpm-maint mailing list

Reply via email to