After wasting time looking at the obviously completely untested patch against 
an imaginary library in PR #117 ... to put it really really politely, I'm not 
in a very positive mood towards this work.

I'm not going to look at a single patch until you show me some numbers to back 
up the change, for each compression type/program separately on traditional 
spinning harddisk, SSD numbers as an added bonus. In rpmbuild context to show 
you've actually tested it.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Rpm-maint mailing list

Reply via email to