This PR is now four months old, where not a single comment on it has been made.
The implementation is completely unintrusive and at possibility to even create
regressions, yet not a single feedback..?
In contrast to the preceeding rpmpython PR, this one has addresses all issues
with and require no additional linking or anything at all, while leaving the
responsibility of optioinally implementing the rpminterp plugin interface to
third parties and outside of rpm upstream with additional maintenance and
complexity from. In stead by leaving it up to third parties, it encourages
further development and benefits from being made outside and indepedent of rpm
itself, having the potential for some serious developments in rpm packaging
with the ability to improve it drastically left in the hands of those doing the
packaging and hence knowing it best.
Please finally review and give feedback on anything that would like to be seen
changed and I'll attend to ASAP. Waiting several months without PRs invested a
lot of time with great ambitions for, only to have it ignored is extremely
demotivating, not encouraging further contributions and has the hallmark of
poor project leadership, especially considering I'm not the only one
experiencing such little interest and appreciation in time and efforts invested
into my contributions..
If anything is unfair about what I wrote, I surely and strongly encourage
anyone who thinks I'm unreasonable and out of line to please comment on this in
this PR as discussions taking place on IRC in stead is completely unfruitful
and the completely wrong place to conduct such anyways.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Rpm-maint mailing list