> I usually find that "static analysis" on scripts is just too much work.
Well, if you do not like static analysis for scripts, I do not promote the
tools for the script files (*.sh, *.py) in this project.
Focusing to interest topics, not quoting and globing and etc.
That makes sense. I can understand it.
I may run the analysis tool for python scripts on my local personally, and send
pull-request for that.
That's good enough for me. Actually the number of the script files is very few.
```
$ find . -name "*.[ch]" | wc -l
243
$ find . -name "*.sh" | wc -l
12
$ find . -name "*.py" | wc -l
2
```
> The make target I use looks like this:
Thanks for the sample code.
How about a style format check for C files?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/306#issuecomment-323547884
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
