So from the documentation at
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html I take that
the file is neither packaged nor installed. Since it's not packaged, the RPM
also doesn't carry a signature and we cannot write a signature out. If someone
wants to write signatures out for %config files by activating the macro, he
needs to be aware that these are mutable files and deal with the fact that
their signature may get lost or end up being wrong. a %ghost file is then more
or less a case of a %config file that will never have a signature written out.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Rpm-maint mailing list