@pmatilai So what do you mean by too clever? Actually, I've been thinking about 
splitting the implementation into a few pieces, each doing only one thing. So 
how about this API: 
[rpmss.h](https://github.com/svpv/rpmss/blob/master/rpmss.h)?  Does it look 
more sensible?  (The implementation is still a bit of a mess, but if we could 
agree on the API...)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#issuecomment-371147144
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to