> But adding packager driven macro enabler/disabler infrastructure instead of
> changing a script seems a grossly ignorant hack (to me).
This shouldn't be (widely) used by packagers.
The main part of this PR is that it *allows* skipping the problematic part of
the script (while still running the beneficial part). The macros/defaults that
enable/disable it should be decided distro-wide.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/434#issuecomment-384067564
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
