> No. And that should be the end of that, thank you.
While I value your point of view a lot, you haven't provided any arguments.
Also it's not very useful to cut something down immediately without discussing
it first. You might be right but you also might not be right. I understand you
went through this before but that's not really an argument if this is a
beneficial change to be made, which I believe it is. So, please, let's give it
some space and time. I don't think this needs to be immediately rejected or
accepted. If you have links to the previous discussions, that would help as
well to save some time.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/450#issuecomment-400224928
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
