NAK for simply removing from the output, as most distros are still actively
using Group. I never understood why Fedora is so compelled to get rid of it, I
find routinely find the group info far more useful than what's slapped into
summary/description for example, but that's just me...
Conditionally showing group only if it exists would be okay I guess. Pretty
much all versions of rpm are supposed to handle a missing group tag where
relevant in the code (index data) but I doubt anybody has tested it in the last
10+ years. Also RPMTAG_GROUP is specified as a required tag in LSB. For
whatever that is worth.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/534#issuecomment-416514755
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
