> If each of them are okay with relicensing this work under MIT, I would 
> recommend that this happen. I can make a PR if needed.

Seems we now have everybody's ack for the license change. @spotrh , a PR would 
be nice since you know the details best. And would actually feel more 
comfortable about accepting it after seeing Mr Estes email about the subject.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/595#issuecomment-469264526
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to