Yes, this is essentially the same limitation as directory <-> symlink 
replacement. The conflict is intentionally raised to avoid bad things during 
transaction, see commit 00d82f1322c6dbf471f61bca7a5cc347fc2fca0a for details.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/964#issuecomment-561061960
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to