Rpm5 compatibility is not a goal, so whether something works there or not isn't relevant generally.
One could consider this a bug on its own merits though. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1088#issuecomment-591881239
_______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
