> We talk about upstreaming changes like this, but to me the situation looks
> pretty much the opposite: this has an active upstream of its own and we're
> merely syncing it from time to time, which is doing double work for ... I
> don't know what.
We are happy to maintain this ourselves. The idea was that if this lives here,
other distros will use it (see the recent contribution by SUSE).
Maybe there might be a compromise by having a separate repo in the
rpm-software-management namespace?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1195#issuecomment-619841494
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
