Double checking the code the unchanged files should not be counted when
`%_minimize_writes` is enabled. So it obviously isn't in this test case.
The question here is why the installation with `--ignoresize` passes without an
error. I wonder if there is some trickery going on on the FS level to not
actually using all those blocks filled with zeros. From an rpm POV this should
not work and rpm is expected to actually use twice as much space unless
`%_minimize_writes` is enabled.
Not sure if this is really worth further exploring...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1232#issuecomment-656739157
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
