> > RPM doesn't actually need the fsverity utility to be present, but it does 
> > need libfsverity
> Yup, the library is what I meant by my comment, not the utility. Thanks for 
> adding the check.
> I'll need to take closer look at the updated version but overall I think its 
> in fair shape for this point, and the added tags totally reasonable. So I'm 
> considering the tags reserved, and there are no competing tag additions at 
> the moment, but if it makes you sleep better we can certainly merge the tag 
> addition right away to cement the reservation.

Hi Panu, any updates on applying these changes?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Rpm-maint mailing list

Reply via email to