> > RPM doesn't actually need the fsverity utility to be present, but it does 
> > need libfsverity
> 
> Yup, the library is what I meant by my comment, not the utility. Thanks for 
> adding the check.
> 
> I'll need to take closer look at the updated version but overall I think its 
> in fair shape for this point, and the added tags totally reasonable. So I'm 
> considering the tags reserved, and there are no competing tag additions at 
> the moment, but if it makes you sleep better we can certainly merge the tag 
> addition right away to cement the reservation.

Hi Panu, any updates on applying these changes?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1203#issuecomment-664363451
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to