That looks like such a hideously ineffective way of incrementing that people
are better off not having it, IMO.
Real world use-cases outside the syntactic sugar category might be easier to
sell.
Furthermore, there are some key iterators where this can't be implemented at
all as the iterator is part of the structure itself (at least rpmds and rpmtd,
the latter isn't even reference counted, and there might be others that I don't
recall).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1359#issuecomment-694653660
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
