I wonder if we should make the interface more sane. I currently made it similar
to rpmExpandMacro(), but that was probably a bad idea. The interface is
currently return 1 on success and -1 on failure, put string in the obuf pointer.
But the straightforward interface would be return string on success, NULL on
failure.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1414#issuecomment-717090028
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
