It certainly is not an RSA signature. See the discussion in #1202 and related.
As the multiple signature support work hasn't progressed anywhere (and it wont
anytime soon), perhaps we should consider just reusing the DSA tag for this
afterall. I guess that's what @mlschroe originally had in mind?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1571#issuecomment-795492178
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
