> I reverted e838c48 because the regression it fixed is no longer an issue, and 
> it makes life a little more complicated for auditors.

NAK!

That thing has been messed with more than enough, and I've asked you to leave 
it alone many times now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1617#issuecomment-816541989
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to