@pmatilai commented on this pull request.


> +         0xb4,
+           (pkt->blen >> 24),
+           (pkt->blen >> 16),
+           (pkt->blen >>  8),
+           (pkt->blen      ),
+       };
+       rpmDigestUpdate(hash, head, 5);
+       rpmDigestUpdate(hash, pkt->body, pkt->blen);
+       rc = 0;
+    }
+    return rc;
+}
+
+static int pgpVerifySelf(pgpDigParams key, pgpDigParams selfsig,
+                       const struct pgpPkt *all, int i)
+{

The point is that we don't sprinkle material like this around. This is just 
redundant clutter in the codebase which makes it unreadable. Whenever you feel 
the need to add a comment or an assert, it's more likely because the code in 
question is dumb and could be written in a better way. Such as here.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1788#discussion_r727785633
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to