> The whole point of sonames is that it's NOT tied to versions but the soname
> abstraction, and this kind of dependency breaks that point.
I think "the point" is that binaries should not need to re-link when a shared
object is updated with a backward-compatible version.
However, because rpm currently only *tracks* the major-version of the soname,
it's possible for rpm (and dnf) to install a package set that doesn't actually
satisfy the
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2372#issuecomment-1408095220
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2372/c1408095...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
