> As far as BUILDHOST goes, rather than using a default value, it would be
> better to just disinclude the tag IMO.
That is certainly an option. But people consider both BUILDTIME and BUILDHOST
very useful for figuring out where/when/who exactly build a package. For
example, even in Fedora infrastructure which tries to keep things very uniform,
builders vary in hardware capabilities and other setup. So at the technical
level, I'm weakly on the side of keeping them, but I know that if we were to
try to drop those fields, it'd cause a huge discussion, and it's just not worth
having that.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2603#issuecomment-1667442928
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2603/1667442...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
