Rpm has always intentionally rejected non-ASCII formats, so in that sense it's
a feature.
I suppose the Sequoia backend could trivially support binary formats too, I
don't have any strong opinion on this.
@nwalfield , thoughts?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2689#issuecomment-1744898600
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2689/1744898...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
