@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -240,10 +240,12 @@ Supplements: (%{name} = %{version}-%{release} and
> langpacks-%{1})\
# Is ignored when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is not set.
%use_source_date_epoch_as_buildtime 0
-# If true, make sure that timestamps in built rpms
-# are not later than the value of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.
-# Is ignored when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is not set.
-%clamp_mtime_to_source_date_epoch 0
+# Defines file timestamp handling in built rpms. Possible values
+# are "clamp_to_buildtime" and "clamp_to_source_date_epoch",
+# which makes sure the the file timestamps are not later than
+# the build time of the package or the value of
+# SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, respectively.
+#%mtime_policy
Sorry I forgot to comment on this: please make that something like
"%build_mtime_policy" so its clear this is a *build* feature.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2944#pullrequestreview-1963683544
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2944/review/1963683...@github.com>_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
