The thought crossed my mind too, I'm a bit torn on this all.
Sure, reverting the order in the aliases would be safe. But, it seems like a
bug that we're storing them in reverse order in the package in the first place,
and something we should fix instead. But, that'd break it for the alleged
existing users who are reverting it. Are there any? I really don't know,
because few people even know you can query the patches like that.
The more I think about it, the less likely it seems that doing the right thing
and reverting the order of sources and patches would break anything. Had people
run into that order reversion, I would've probably heard of it. And this is
actually the first time that even I so much as notice it :smile:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3011#issuecomment-2033675076
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3011/c2033675...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
