I read this issue as being "we should fail, but currently we ignore by default.
Let's fail by default and provide an option to ignore"
Which would be a change to how it currently behaves in addition to adding a new
option (to restore present behavior)
But I might have read that incorrectly
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1939#issuecomment-2039764446
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1939/2039764...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
